DC’s apartment market is booming, based on data from a recent report from MPF Research.

image
425 Mass

In its mid-year report, the multi-family housing research firm stated that apartment occupancy across the area for the first six months of the year reached just over 95 percent, and rents increased almost four percent.

The findings are in line with what we have been hearing from area apartment projects. We reported earlier this month that 425 Mass (formerly The Dumont) was filling up fast, signing leases with 182 tenants in the first 90 days since opening its doors. Further evidence of an increased demand can be seen by the fact that finding any significant rental concessions in the DC area (all the rage at the end of last year) is fairly difficult.

Here are few other highlights from the report summary:

While there aren’t any real neighborhood-level weak spots for occupancy, a couple of submarkets — North Arlington County and Reston/Herndon — do stand out for their really tight occupancy readings. Unlike other locales across the country, the greater Washington area remains a fairly active building zone. Ongoing construction totals about 5,200 units, and there are some developments that are making it out of the starting gate now.

The surge in the rental market extends to the rest of the country, with Bloomberg attributing the activity to the mounting foreclosures that are reducing homeownership and “an improving job market for young adults encourages them to find their own places to live.”

http://dc.urbanturf.com/articles/blog/dcs_apartment_vacancy_drops_construction_booms/2309

Jul

27

Monday, July 26, 2010, 11:06am EDT  |  Modified: Tuesday, July 27, 2010, 3:29am

Washington Business Journal

Sales of new, single-family houses in June rose 23.6 percent from May, though new home sales nationally were down 16.7 percent from a year ago.

The Commerce Department also reports the supply of new homes on the market represented 7.6 months worth of inventory, down from 9.6 months in May.

Sales rose in three of the nation’s four regions.

In the South, which includes Virginia, Maryland and D.C., new home sales rose 33.1 percent from May. Sales in the South were down 6.1 percent from a year earlier.

The year-over-year decline in the South was the smallest annual decline among regions.

The report comes a week after Reston-based home builder NVR Inc. reported a surge in sales in the second quarter as buyers raced to beat the June 30 deadline to settle in order to qualify for the homebuyer tax credit.

NVR (NYSE: NVR) also reported new orders declined 6 percent during the second quarter, and its backlog of homes sold but not settled was down 16 percent from a year ago.

Read more: New home sales rise - Washington Business Journal

Jul

26

Investors who bailed out consider retesting the housing market waters

(Anthony Freda For The Washington Post)

By Tomoeh Murakami Tse

Special to The Washington Post
Sunday, July 25, 2010


New York — In hindsight, Scott Feldman’s decision to sell his first home in late 2006 could have been a case study in a textbook called “How to Time the Real Estate Market.”

Feldman, who works at a private equity firm, sold his two-bedroom apartment on Manhattan’s Upper East Side for $879,000, about 40 percent more than what he paid for it in 2003.

But whether Feldman’s return to homeownership proves as financially savvy remains to be seen. After weathering the recession in a rental unit, he bought a five-bedroom house in a New Jersey suburb last spring for 30 percent below the original asking price.

“We probably overpaid for it — but we’re happy here,” Feldman said, adding that he and his wife’s decision to buy had less to do with calling a market bottom than settling into a community their two young children, nearing school age, could grow up in.

Indeed, while some financially sophisticated professionals who foresaw the housing crisis — and acted on it — have re-entered the housing market, others remain renters today. With the fledgling housing-market recovery suddenly deteriorating, these holdouts are scrutinizing the increasingly uncertain economy and doing old-fashioned, shoe-leather research on their local real estate markets as they weigh the timing of their return to homeownership.

Of course, no one is expecting the kind of double-digit annual appreciation that created the illusion of homes as red-hot investments and bottomless cash machines. But as other assets recover from the lows of the financial crisis — the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index is up 65 percent from March 2009, for example — and home sales and even prices inch up in some markets, more investors sitting on cash are starting to wonder: Do I dare put my money in real estate?

Those who have bought say they largely wanted to take advantage of record-low interest rates and a recently expired tax credit for homeowners. They also note that prices had dropped to a point where the emotional benefits of homeownership outweighed potential losses from further price declines.

Meanwhile, the holdouts cite a number of reasons for staying put — cheap rents and still-declining home prices, tight credit and expiration of a popular tax credit to spur home sales, lingering unemployment and rising uncertainty about the economy.

“You have to be patient,” said Mark Kiesel, global head of the corporate bond portfolio management group at Pimco. Kiesel has been renting since selling his house in 2006 and recently renewed his lease for another 18 months. “You have to stick to the fundamentals. There are more sellers than buyers — it’s that simple.”

Ben and Julie Feldman sold their 900-square-foot condominium in Dupont Circle in fall 2005. This spring, they went house hunting but concluded that prices were still too high.

“Given the level of uncertainty about short- and medium-term economic performance, it really doesn’t make sense to jump in unless you have a five-to-10-year horizon,” said Ben Feldman, 44, an independent consultant and a renter in Capitol Hill.

Home prices have proved volatile. After a steady decline from mid-2006, national average home prices climbed more than 6 percent in mid-2009, but they have dipped since then. Overall, prices are off by about a third from peak levels through March of this year. That follows the huge run-up in prices — a 90 percent appreciation — from the beginning of 2000 to their peak in 2006, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller home price index.

In comparison, the S&P 500 index fell nearly 14 percent from the beginning of 2000, near the peak of the tech boom, to mid-2006.

With the cloudy economic outlook and tightened lending standards, Feldman is concerned that the shrinking pool of eligible buyers will pull prices down further.

In the meantime, he is not too worried about missing out on a chance to buy at the bottom. “We were lucky enough to call the top once,” he said, “and that gives us a little bit of a cushion about missing the bottom.”

Of course, perfectly timing the market is an elusive feat for even the most successful investors. Rather than worrying about making a perfect call on the way back in, professionals who sold near the peak say assessing one’s personal and financial situation, as well as risk tolerance, is critical.

After watching the breathtaking buildup of homes in the Southern California community of Carlsbad, Axel Merk of Merk Investments and his wife, also an executive at the firm, sold their two condos and invested the proceeds in their mutual fund business. One sold in 2004, the other in 2005.

The couple bought a house in the Bay Area in November. The purchase “does not suggest that we believe the prices have bottomed but that we can afford the risk of prices going down further,” Merk said.

“We sold out a bit early, but we have no ambitions of picking the exact top or bottom, as that’s almost impossible to do,” he added. “It always amazes me how long a bubble can last.”

Dean Baker, an economist who was among the most vocal bears during the housing bubble, agrees. He acknowledges that he and his wife may not have maximized their profit when they sold an Adams Morgan condo in 2004, or their savings when they bought a house last spring in the District’s 16th Street Heights neighborhood.

Still, Baker expresses few regrets. The selling price on the condominium was nearly three times the 1997 purchase price. And he and his wife, also an economist, were able to take advantage of an $8,000 tax credit and historically low interest rates of 4.25 percent upon their return to the housing market.

Kiesel, of Pimco, has begun house hunting, and even made a few bids. He says he could buy as early as this fall, when he expects a “flush-out” of excess inventory to start. But the overhang of inventory will probably linger through 2012, Kiesel said, and he plans to remain patient.

Kiesel thinks a fair value for a house similar to the one he sold in 2006 in the same neighborhood is roughly half of what it was in 2006 — another decline of 10 to 15 percent from current prices.

“The housing market has not bottomed yet, especially for the high end, as taxes are headed higher, credit remains extremely difficult to obtain and renting remains cheap vs. buying,” he said. “Supply is still greater than demand, which means prices will likely keep falling. The only place where that’s different is the lower end, because that’s where government has come in to subsidize financing and credit.”

For all the sophisticated spreadsheets and financial data Scott Feldman (no relation to Ben and Julie Feldman) analyzes at work, the signs that prompted him to sell his Manhattan apartment were decidedly Main Street: newspaper articles about soaring home prices, the proliferation of exotic mortgages and first-time home buyers snapping up dream penthouses.

“I was watching TV and there was this show called ‘Flip This House,’ . . . ” Feldman said. “It just didn’t seem right. It was just such a sign of a top when you see TV shows about people buying and selling homes in two months and making hundreds of thousands of dollars.”

For some, the market may look attractive now after three years of price declines. Feldman warns that buyers should be careful.

“If you’re a transient person, don’t buy anything. If you’re a young person, don’t buy anything,” Feldman said. “Don’t buy anything unless you’re going to be there for a long time.”

How long is a long time?

“My wife and I have a deal that we will never leave and never move,” Feldman said, “because moving is so much work.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/24/AR2010072400195_2.html

Saturday, July 24, 2010

Mortgage rates fell this week to a record low for the fourth time in five weeks.

The average for 30-year fixed-rate loans was 4.56 percent, down from 4.57 last week, mortgage company Freddie Mac said Thursday. That’s the lowest since Freddie Mac began tracking rates in 1971.

The last time home loan rates were lower was during the 1950s, when most mortgages lasted 20 or 25 years.

The rate on the 15-year fixed loan dropped this week to 4.03 percent, down from 4.06 percent last week and the lowest on records dating from 1991.

The average for five-year adjustable-rate mortgages was 3.79 percent, down from 3.85 percent a week earlier. One-year ARMs fell to an average of 3.7 percent, from 3.74 percent.

The rates do not include add-on fees known as points. One point is equal to 1 percent of the total loan amount. The nationwide fee in Freddie Mac’s survey averaged 0.7 a point for 30-, 15- and one-year loans. The average fee for five-year loans was 0.6 of a point.

It’s unlikely that low mortgage rates will bolster housing. Rates have hovered near historic lows for more than a year, so many people have already taken advantage of them to buy or refinance a home.

And many of those who haven’t wouldn’t qualify for a loan. They either owe more than their homes are worth, have shaky credit or have lost their jobs.

“It’s a small decrease in interest rates, so it might attract a few more homebuyers, but more importantly it opens the window of refinancing opportunities for people with fixed-rate mortgages,” said Keith Gumbinger, vice president of HSH Associates, a publisher of consumer loan information, in Pompton Plains, N.J.

The Mortgage Bankers Association’s gauge of refinancing increased 8.6 percent in the week ended July 16 to the highest level since May 2009, the association said Wednesday. The purchase index climbed 3.4 percent from a 13-year low.

– From news services

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/23/AR2010072300084.html

Thursday, July 22, 2010, 10:15am EDT

Washington Business Journal - by Jeff Clabaugh

Long-term mortgage rates fell again this week, with both 30-year and 15-year fixed-rate mortgages at the lowest levels since McLean-based Freddie Mac began keeping track.

The average rate on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage in the week ending July 22 was 4.56 percent, down from 4.57 percent last week, the lowest since at least 1971. A 15-year fixed-rate mortgage averaged 4.03 percent, the lowest since at least 1991.

A one-year, adjustable-rate mortgage averaged 3.70 percent, down from 3.74 percent last week.

“The decline in mortgage rates over the past few weeks echoes the recent signs of weakening confidence in the strength of the economy, particularly the housing and consumer sectors,” said Freddie Mac (OTC: FMCC) chief economist Frank Nothaft.

Despite record low mortgage rates, housing sales and builder confidence are pausing.

A separate report Thursday from the National Association of Realtors said sales of existing homes fell 5.1 percent in June, the second straight monthly decline. Another report earlier this week from the National Association of Home Builders said its gauge of homebuilder confidence fell to the lowest level since August 2009.

Read more: Mortgage rates fall to new lows - Washington Business Journal

Wednesday, July 14, 2010, 10:23am EDTHome sales are still rising in the mid-Atlantic region, according to a report from Metropolitan Regional Information Systems Inc. Sales in the region rose 10 percent from May to June, the report states.

Read more at Washington Business Journal

Categories: Economic Snapshot, Residential Real Estate

http://www.bizjournals.com/washington/breaking_ground/2010/07/mid-atlantic_housing_sales_rise.html?surround=lfnblog


Companies: Metropolitan Regional Information Systems Inc.

Read more: Mid-Atlantic housing sales rise - Washington Business Journal

By Kenneth R. Harney

Saturday, July 10, 2010 Picture this: You’ve signed a contract to sell your house. Your buyers say they have nailed down the right mortgage. All is well. But then the appraisal comes in low — $25,000 to $50,000 under what was agreed upon in the contract.

The lender insists on cutting the mortgage amount to reflect the lower appraised value. You refuse to negotiate anywhere near the price indicated by the appraisal, and suddenly — poof! The whole deal is off. You, the buyers and the agents involved are all left sputtering over the appraisal that scuttled the transaction.

This scenario is not unusual in many markets across the country, say home builders, brokers and appraisers. Here’s one little-publicized reason why: Lenders unilaterally may be lowering the numbers on the appraisals submitted to them, in order to avoid accusations that the loans they sell to giant investors Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac are based on inflated appraisals — even slightly inflated. Such value inflations can expose lenders to dreaded “buyback” demands, forcing them to repurchase loans at huge costs.

The vice chairman of the National Association of Realtors’ Appraisal Committee, Frank K. Gregoire of St. Petersburg, Fla., says it’s a widespread problem. Large numbers of legitimate home sales are “sabotaged by lenders and underwriters arbitrarily reducing the value estimate” provided by the appraiser.

Typically, Gregoire says, the lender orders a low-cost electronic valuation — based on publicly available statistical data, with no onsite inspections — to review the accuracy of what was submitted by the appraiser. If there’s a discrepancy between what the computer says and what the appraiser reports, the lender’s underwriters sometimes simply cut the number — even if this means knocking the real estate transaction off track. Or they demand an immediate explanation from the appraiser.

All this may be about to change. Effective Sept. 1, Fannie Mae is prohibiting lenders who sell it loans from changing appraisers’ numbers. In guidance issued June 30, Fannie said lenders must contact appraisers to “resolve” any disagreements about the valuation. If that’s not possible, they should order a second appraisal — not just chop the value.

Appraisers applauded the new rule. “This is huge,” said Gary Crabtree, president of Affiliated Appraisers of Bakersfield, Calif., and a member of the national government relations committee of the Appraisal Institute, an industry group. Pat Turner, an appraiser in Richmond, said Fannie’s new requirement “is great news for consumers” because loan underwriters hundreds of miles from the property “no longer will be able to change the appraiser’s valuation” simply because they pulled a lower number off a computer.

Turner said these electronic models “are often inaccurate” and provide no information on a property’s condition. He said an appraisal completed recently in Virginia was challenged by a review company based in California using a proprietary electronic-valuation system. The reviewer wanted to know why Turner hadn’t used a specific property in the area as a “comparable” in doing his appraisal on the house. Turner checked out the suggested “comp,” and it turned out to be a vacant lot, worth far less than the house — not a true comp “by any stretch of the imagination.”

Fannie’s new guidelines also attempt to clarify other issues that have arisen during the past year, including the widespread use of inexperienced appraisers who are unfamiliar with local market conditions. Real estate agents, builders and mortgage brokers have complained to Congress that rules adopted by Fannie and Freddie last year encouraged lenders to use “appraisal management” companies to value properties.

Those companies, in turn, often pay appraisers deeply discounted fees — half off traditional prevailing rates in some cases — and require them to complete their assignments far faster than normal turnaround times. Critics have said that low-budget appraisers working for management companies frequently travel long distances to do their valuations, have minimal access to local data, and make excessive use of foreclosures and short sales as comparables — thereby depressing the values of non-distressed sales in the area.

Fannie’s letter attempts to clarify its “appraiser selection” standards. Top on the list: Appraisers should be experienced, “have the requisite knowledge” about local market conditions and have access to all local data sources. Fannie also emphasized that the demonstrated experience of an appraiser should always trump fees or turnaround times — a clear swipe at management companies that bid out their work on the latter two criteria.

Asked whether Freddie Mac plans to issue similar rules on appraisal-quality standards, a spokesman said, “We’re definitely looking at it.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/08/AR2010070806803.html

Jul

12

NoMa

Posted by Kerry Fortune under For Buyers, For Sellers, General Information

Saturday, July 10, 2010

BOUNDARIES:
NoMa is roughly bordered by Massachusetts Avenue to the south, New Jersey Avenue and North Capitol Street to the west, Q and R streets NE to the north, and the CSX/Metrorail tracks to the east.
SCHOOLS: Emery Education Campus and Walker-Jones Education Campus for elementary; Browne Education Campus, Jefferson Middle School and Walker-Jones Education Campus for middle school; and Dunbar Senior High School.

HOME SALES: In the resale market, two townhouses sold in the past 12 months, for $372,500 and $380,000, according to Eric Cooksey of McEnearney Associates. Three existing condominiums sold, priced from $190,000 to $360,000. No homes have recently been on the resale market, Cooksey said. Sales figures for new costruction were unavailable.

WITHIN WALKING DISTANCE: New York Avenue and its Metro station, Union Station, Metropolitan Branch Trail.

WITHIN 10 MINUTES BY CAR: Capitol Hill, Interstates 395 and 295, downtown Washington, H Street corridor, Home Depot and Giant Food in the Rhode Island Place shopping center, Gallaudet University.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/08/AR2010070806866.html

Michael Gerrity

07/08/10 8:00 AM EST

According to Clear Capital’s latest Home Data Index (HDI), federal homebuyer tax credits magnified springtime price gains as national quarter-over-quarter price increases reach 5.2%; year-over-year prices up 8.8%.

“Price trends nationwide have a seen a considerable upswing driven in large part by the flurry of recent sales attributed to the tax credit and springtime buying activity,” said Dr. Alex Villacorta, Senior Statistician, Clear Capital. “This month’s national quarterly gains are certainly a positive sign that many markets have responded to the tax credit incentive, but overall markets remain volatile as evidenced by the six month price change keeping mostly flat.”

Report highlights include:

  • National / Four Region Overview: Across the U.S., home prices posted 5.2% quarter-over-quarter gains, placing prices firmly 8.8% above levels experienced one year ago. Regionally, the Midwest and South saw the largest quarterly price growth, while the West and Northeast show more stable quarterly gains.
  • Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) drilldown: Home price gains across the U.S. were helped largely by the quarterly jump in prices by the top 15 highest performing major markets. Quarterly prices for the group are up an average 12.6%, while yearly price gains are up 17.1%.
  • Micro Market Analysis: Home prices in the Los Angeles MSA rebounded 13.2% from its market bottom one year ago. While this surpassed the 8.8% gains seen nationally for the same period, conditions varied widely across this large and diverse market.

“Metro level markets are showing recent signs of healthy price growth, yet many of these markets are simply returning to their pre-winter levels, and some of the hardest hit areas remain as much as 54 percent below their 2006 peaks,” added Dr. Villacorta. “While there is still a lot of ground to be made up, the 8.8 percent yearly gain is a strong lift off of the severe lows of last year, especially when you consider in the same time period unemployment and REO saturation levels hit their highest point in more than two decades.”

National/Four Region Market Overview (June 2009 - June 2010)

clear-capital-07083020-chart-1.jpg

Home prices across the nation made strong moves in a positive direction. Thanks to an increase in springtime sales and the continued residual effects of the federal housing home buyer tax credits, all four regions posted positive gains. Across the U.S., home prices rose 5.2 percent this quarter, bringing the nation back to within one percent of last fall’s levels and placing prices firmly 8.8 percent above levels of a year ago. Regionally, the Midwest and South saw the largest quarterly price growth, while the West and Northeast show more stable quarterly gains.

The Midwest continued to lead the nation with quarterly price gains of 9.2 percent, pushing year-over-year gains to 17.2 percent off the deep lows of last year. The other three regions experienced yearly prices more consistent to the national year-over-year average (8.8%). Despite strong quarterly gains, all four regions remained within two percent of the levels achieved last fall, revealing the price volatility that was experienced this past winter.

As a whole, the REO saturation rate was reduced to 24.6 percent, a decline of 3.2 percentage points from what was reported last month. It’s likely the effects of the April tax credit have been amplified with the onset of the springtime buying season, and while some have questioned the timing of this credit with concern about the downstream effects on demand, it’s evident that the tax credit did succeed, at least in the near-term, in creating an environment more resilient to the ongoing foreclosure influences.

Metro Markets (June 2009 - June 2010)

clear-capital-07083020-chart-2.jpg

The overall home price gains across the U.S. were aided largely by the quarterly jump in prices by the top 15 highest performing major markets. Last month’s single digit price gains signaled the onset of these conditions, and have been replaced with double digit quarterly gains among the top ten markets. After the winter drop in home prices, the timing of the tax credit has added another leg to the price volatility experienced in recent years. However, with quarterly prices for the group up 12.6 percent and yearly price gains up 17.1 percent on average, the volatility is in the positive direction which has helped absorb some of the burden on the market maintained through the presence of distressed sales.

The larger markets of the West have remained more stable, falling off the highest performing market list as they exhibit smaller increases than the more volatile markets of the South and Midwest. This is apparent in Memphis, Tenn. and Cleveland, Ohio, which jumped into the number one and two ranked positions, respectively.

While the seasonal timing and incentivized price swings have played into the substantial quarterly price increases of these markets, it’s important to measure the broader recovery of these markets by looking at longer time periods, as well as isolate the influence of the REO segment. In Cleveland, current home prices are still 54.6 percent below its market peak in 2005. While this is a very steep decline, it’s actually recovered 21.3 percentage points compared to the peak of its decline (-75.9% price change) in early 2009. Further, if you remove REO sales from equation, the quarterly price growth of the non-REO segment in Cleveland still stands at 8.5 percent, a substantial gain but far below the 20.5 percent combined number used in this month’s rankings.

Similarly, Memphis’ quarterly price gain of 20.6 percent leaves prices 1.9 percent below their levels of the fall of 2009. Prices in Memphis have dropped 51.1 percent from the market peak in late 2005 to trough in 2009, and have recovered 11.8 percentage points, now only down 39.3 percent from the peak of the market. With a quarterly price increase of 5.8 percent for the non-REO market, it further highlights the gains found among the distressed segment.
clear-capital-07083020-chart-3.jpg

Nearly all the lowest performing major markets saw quarterly prices swing from the negative to the positive compared to quarterly numbers reported last month. Bolstered largely by markets in the East and West regions, quarterly gains among these fifteen markets averaged 1.5 percent while yearly gains averaged 6.0 percent. All markets except Honolulu, Hawaii, saw REO saturation rates decline, leaving a group average saturation rate of 26.3 percent.

Only two markets, Baltimore, Md. and Orlando, Fla. saw prices remain below their levels of a year ago. However, both markets did manage to edge closer to positive year-over-year territory when compared to last month’s reported numbers. Honolulu and the California markets of San Diego, Riverside, and Fresno saw stable quarterly price gains, with each market’s quarterly growth rate varying by less than one percentage point compared to last month’s report.

As recently as last month, many of these markets were on the highest performing list, a reflection of their relative stability compared to many of the current highest performing major markets.

Micro Markets (June 2009 - June 2010)

This section highlights a single market every month with a deeper dive into how the micro- and macro-markets relate to each other.

clear-capital-07083020-chart-4.jpg

Home prices in the Los Angeles Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) rebounded 13.2 percent from its market bottom one year ago. While this surpassed the 8.8 percent gains seen at the national level for the same period, conditions varied widely across this large and diverse market. At more local levels, some markets saw prices outperform the metro-level numbers, while other markets have underperformed both the metro and national gains. These micro market trends are informative, revealing differences in the buyer base of each market.

With recent demand focused on lower-priced and distressed properties, an area in western Santa Ana (ZIP code 92703) outpaced the rest of the Los Angeles MSA by returning a 29.5 percent gain for the past year. With an REO saturation rate that peaked above 70 percent in 2008, and a property mix of lower-priced single family, condominiums and manufactured housing, this micro market has proved volatile both on the decline (losing 52.2% since peak) and recent recovery. As REO saturation rates declined into the 30 percent range over the last year, the rapid consumption of discounted foreclosures is evident, and indicates the influx of first-time home buyers and investors.

One segment of West Hollywood (ZIP code 90069), an area of high-priced single family homes and condominium units, has seen a -13.7 percent price change over the past year–the worst in the Los Angeles MSA. With few high-end buyers and little incentive to purchase higher priced homes, this normally attractive area has struggled to find a pricing bottom. Price changes of -32.9 percent since market peak (the current year-over-year dip leaves it at its lowest point since 2006), indicates this market is suffering from the slow economic recovery; a contrast to the steep declines and sudden upward bounce of some markets as they feel the impact of incentives and speculative buying.

clear-capital-07083020-chart-5.jpg


Click Here To See Prior News Posts By This Contributor »http://www.realestatechannel.com/us-markets/residential-real-estate-1/real-estate-news-homebuyer-tax-credit-clear-capital-report-home-data-index-hdi-us-home-prices-housing-trends-home-foreclosures-2816.php


4.58%

The average rate for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage sunk to 4.58 percent this week, according to Freddie Mac. That beats last week’s already-historic 4.69 percent, which was the lowest on record since Freddie Mac started keep tracking in 1971.

Despite the eye-popping rate, the national housing market remains in what experts have called the “post-tax credit hangover.” The Feds’ homebuyer tax credit that expired at the end of April pulled housing demand forward, meaning some people that would have bought throughout the summer months hurried to buy before April 30th, leaving a gap in demand now. Exacerbating the weak demand are tighter lending standards, which exclude some would-be buyers from qualifying for a mortgage.

The market will probably remain slow through the summer, which is real estate’s low season anyway. Going into the fall, there will be a lot of anticipation about whether the market will pick back up.

http://dc.urbanturf.com/articles/blog/at_4.58_mortgage_rates_set_another_record/2230

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6-10 >